Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar >> to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some >> strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem >> providers. >> >> Only, this is on the bleeding edge beta posted today, and hits >> Unix (particularly with our new cleaned-up default for #LoadModule). > > I talked with Rainer about this and we came to the conclusion, that we simply > should keep non-default modules commented out, even if they have been > explicitly enabled with --enable-foo. This has also the advantage that it is > more likely that the user will only enable what he currently needs, even if > he has built some additional modules he may need later. > > Does anyone disagree? > > Cheers, > Stefan >
