On 11/11/2011 1:42 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
-0
I DO want the EOL, but not until after 2.4 has a couple of GAs, if only
because folks might not update twice.
They've had six years? I'm talking deprecating 2.0, not 2.2,
for 2.4 -or- 2.2. Lots of choices, including putting off any
upgrade.
They have as long as they like to update. The 2.0.65 would not
suddenly stop functioning. But if it doesn't work as they
desire, they need to pick 2.2.x or 2.4.x, and there won't be
some 2.0.66 at some arbitrary date a year or so out (as the
past couple releases have been spaced apart).
This action sets up one clear signal, there will not be another
2.0.x to follow, so don't wait around for one, look to the 2.4
and 2.2 stable releases if you want something the project will
keep updating, no matter how infrequently in the case of 2.2.
Bill
