On 11/11/2011 3:12 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I don't see why we would continue to support 2.0.x for longer than Redhat's already long support cycles.
I don't see why we would tie this to RedHat's schedule or any other vendor, including my own.
On 11/11/2011 3:12 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I don't see why we would continue to support 2.0.x for longer than Redhat's already long support cycles.
I don't see why we would tie this to RedHat's schedule or any other vendor, including my own.