On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Steffen wrote: > We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and no need > to exposure more for these.
Are they listed in STATUS under the Release Showstoppers section? That currently only lists the need to remove undocumented modules as showstopper, and I believe we have even booked some progress on that one. Going by STATUS, things do indeed look stable, good and happy. This is not so much for folks like yourself who are intimately familiar with these bugs, but more for the rest of us who don't use Windows and may never encounter the problems. > Fine a GA, with a big note that it is not ready for Windows and advising to > run 2.2.21 as proven stable. I would hate that: we have lots of users on Windows and I'd like to enable them to use the latest, greatest. S. > > So not happy with 2.4. > > > Op 11 jan. 2012 om 16:37 heeft Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > >> Things look stable. >> Things look good. >> Things look happy. >> >> Sooooo are we ready to finally make this happen?? >> I offer to RM. > -- [email protected] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
