On 31.01.2012 16:17, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Jan 2012, at 5:07 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
6) mod_cache
============
Applied to 2.4.x but not in trunk:
r1208384 | minfrin | 2011-11-30 12:21:43 +0100 (Wed, 30 Nov 2011) | 4 lines
mod_cache: Revert http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1070179
as per the following thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/395830?do=post_view_threaded#395830
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1208824 | minfrin | 2011-11-30 23:00:43 +0100 (Wed, 30 Nov 2011) | 4 lines
Backport:
mod_cache: Apply the API change that allows future mod_cache providers to
invalidate cache entries, which will fix PR15868.
Should both be ported forwards?
Both v2.4 and trunk have the same API signature as intended (no diff between
mod_cache.h on v2.4 and trunk), is this an actual difference you've just found,
or is this just following the commit log?
All the items listed are actual code differences. The log info was the
shortest way to explain the differences. I tried hard to verify, that
the differences I've seen are actually the ones generatde by these
missing commits.
In this case check
modules/cache/cache_storage.c
modules/cache/cache_storage.h
modules/cache/mod_cache.c
for differences.
Regards,
Rainer
