On 07 Mar 2012, at 1:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Would we ever use this on the v2.4 branch at all? >> > > Sure... assume a case with 2.4.10 and trunk has changed enough > that to fix a bug in 2.4.10, there is no direct backport, but > rather a one-off.
Would it not be safer to give instructions to drop a particular path into the tree in order to allocate a number, the same way the "build" directory is dropped into the documentation tree? This could solve the tags-have-moved problem. Regards, Graham --
