And here... +1 On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> I think this message is outdated and should be fixed. For 2.4.x and trunk >> its even worse because it points to the no >> longer existing apr-util/trunk. >> Anyone opposed if I clean this up in the following way: >> >> 2.2.x: branches/1.4.x >> 2.4.x: branches/1.5.x >> trunk: trunk of APR > > +1 here >
