Done (r1387473, r1387474, r1387477). I did one small change by pointing trunk to apr-util 1.5.x instead of apr trunk as this message is handling the case where apr < 2.0 is used and hence apr-util is not part of it.
Regards Rüdiger > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Dienstag, 18. September 2012 15:27 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: which apr-util is really "desired" for the 2.2.X branch > > And here... +1 > > On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> I think this message is outdated and should be fixed. For 2.4.x and > trunk its even worse because it points to the no > >> longer existing apr-util/trunk. > >> Anyone opposed if I clean this up in the following way: > >> > >> 2.2.x: branches/1.4.x > >> 2.4.x: branches/1.5.x > >> trunk: trunk of APR > > > > +1 here > >
