On 10/02/2012 01:56 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing. >> If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif >> images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg >> version. Or if the original author still has the original material, >> he/she can make the necessary changes, I'm fine with whichever it is. >> > > Been there, done that, have it still. What stopped it then was the font. > What license is the font under. > It begs me to ask what the license of the font currently in use is. > > So this leads me to again ask the question, what font license is > acceptable? > > I can get plenty close with a font from the Open Font Library, it is > licensed under the SIL Open Font License 1.1 > http://scripts.sil.org/OFL > > There is only one ugly blog font licensed under the Apache 2.0 License > that I have found. > So if we are going to hold out for the AL2.0, we should be fontless. > > Regards, > Gregg > Righto, ASL getting in the way ;) I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff: "Powered by" and "2.4" is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL "Apache" is done with Syncopate, which is also using ASL.
Take a look and see if the result is close enough for jazz, http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/poweredby.svg With regards, Daniel.
