On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:43:13 -0800 Gregg Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/5/2013 2:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > In catching up with building 2.2.23 and getting somewhere with 2.4.3 > > (soon to be .24 and .4 from today's email notes), I'm left with one > > quandary. > > > > The 2.2 builds all used OpenSSL 0.9.8 and that's where I would leave > > it, while 2.4 builds aught to use 1.0.1. That, and libxml2 and lua > > are the packages we don't bundle. > Since chances are from responses previously posted here on the > subject, any binary distribution coming from a.o is not going to be > able to load mod_php (PHP 5.4's php5apache2_4.dll currently) so it > forces the use of mod_fcgid. That being the case, I see no reason not > to use openssl 1.0.1. That may or may not be an issue. On Windows we can load both the PHP and mod_ssl flavors of OpenSSL at the same time if their dll names are unique. Unless msvc resources opened in httpd are closed by mod_php or visa versa, two flavors of msvc can also coexist. So mod_php aught to load and function although mod_fcgid is still more optimal. > > But for the expat and pcre dependencies, the versions we shipped in > > 2.2.23 and 2.4.3-deps sources are falling out of date. And I doubt > > a bundle of 2.4.4-deps is going to be updated either. > > expat's still in APR, I know libxml2 can be used, not sure how to > build with it though. I plan to give libxml2 a spin in apr for httpd 2.4, given that mod_proxy_html requires that lib anyways.
