Any news on this? Greetz
Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > Please don't submit what could be controversial reverts > over a weekend. > > On May 17, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I will revert the changes done with: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1332643 > > after 72 hours if nobody is going to fix the stuff properly for Windows > since I'm tired of always copying mod_ssl over from 2.4.x branch in order > to get a working mod_ssl with trunk. > > > > Reasons: > > 1) within last 12 months there was no attempt made to fix the issues > which wrowe mentioned in this thread [1] - instead discussion died > > 2) a suggestion to fix the issue [2] was not applied due to the concerns > wrowe brought up, and to which I agree. > > 3) the same issue also causes a stalled backport in 2.2.x STATUS [3] for > the last 12 months > > > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130205115224.33547872@hub%3E > > [2] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201302.mbox/%3c510d8293.8010...@gknw.net%3E > > [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1333501 > > > > I believe that one year in trunk without further review is long enough, > and if someone wants to continue working on it its easy enough to checkout > the last revision before removal. > > > > Gün. > > > > > >
