On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:52:05 -0400 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Maybe the real question is where exactly do we stand with > Windows right now... > > We haven't had (complimentary) binary builds for Windows in > quite awhile and, afaict, there are really no people focusing > on Windows compatibility anymore. Thanks you just reminded me... Another question is where exactly do we stand with OS/X right now? Apple HFS+ is still not supported, there exists a forced lower-case canonicalization hack authored by Apple, but AFAICT still no progress on retrieving the true name of a file on a case-insensitive OS/X volume which I suspect are still in common use on most OS/X boxen. Of course, all the BSD-based file systems are strict case sensitive and don't have security bypass issues when running 'vanilla' httpd. Unfortunately I don't run an OS/X box anymore so it's awfully hard for me to complete research on such a fix (and isn't so personally interesting since my ppc laptop was retired for lack of OS updates). Also wondering where the OS/X download lives? It will build on any OS/X box with a deployed toolchain, but I imagine many OS/X users don't install that toolchain and live with the Apple provided flavors, and would guess that 2.4.x is not part of that Apple OS distributions so far.
