On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Indeed, that was not consistent! > > This is a second fix then, the check was doubly broken... > > > > I'm not sure... > Yes, APR_EAGAIN is "all workers busy", so the <= 1 was really needed. Your last commit is fine.
