On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Nitpicking: Shouldn't that be sizeof(conn_slave_rec *)? > It doesn't make a real difference, but makes things clearer I guess. > Yep. Thx. I had orig had that array of conn_rec *'s, but it's easier if it's a struct that includes conn_rec *s. I forgot to make that adj.
