On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > [email protected] wrote: >> Author: jkaluza >> Date: Fri Jul 11 12:49:54 2014 >> New Revision: 1609709 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1609709 >> Log: >> bump mmn because of r1609680 >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h?rev=1609709&r1=1609708&r2=1609709&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h Fri Jul 11 12:49:54 2014 >> @@ -464,6 +464,8 @@ >> * 20140611.1 (2.5.0-dev) Add ap_proxy_connect_uds(). >> * 20140627.0 (2.5.0-dev) Revert 20140611.0 change. >> * 20140627.1 (2.5.0-dev) add last_backend_conn to util_ldap_connection_t >> + * 20140627.2 (2.5.0-dev) Added is_name_matchable to proxy_worker_shared. > > In this case I think this no issue, but wouldn't this require a major bump > once this would cause > ALIGNED_PROXY_WORKER_SHARED_SIZE to increase? > Historically, every time we change proxy_worker_shared, we bump mmn (see previous bumps). Plus, we also added ap_proxy_define_match_worker() as well, which is part of the bump (and should be part of the comment as well, now that I think of it).
