On 07/11/2014 03:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
jkal...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jkaluza
Date: Fri Jul 11 12:49:54 2014
New Revision: 1609709
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1609709
Log:
bump mmn because of r1609680
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h?rev=1609709&r1=1609708&r2=1609709&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h Fri Jul 11 12:49:54 2014
@@ -464,6 +464,8 @@
* 20140611.1 (2.5.0-dev) Add ap_proxy_connect_uds().
* 20140627.0 (2.5.0-dev) Revert 20140611.0 change.
* 20140627.1 (2.5.0-dev) add last_backend_conn to util_ldap_connection_t
+ * 20140627.2 (2.5.0-dev) Added is_name_matchable to proxy_worker_shared.
In this case I think this no issue, but wouldn't this require a major bump once
this would cause
ALIGNED_PROXY_WORKER_SHARED_SIZE to increase?
Historically, every time we change proxy_worker_shared, we bump mmn
(see previous bumps).
Plus, we also added ap_proxy_define_match_worker() as well,
which is part of the bump (and should be part of the comment
as well, now that I think of it).
It is part of the comment, but on the second line, which is not pasted
above :).
Jan Kaluza
