Re: Question on ap_method_* functions

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 15/07/2014 10:15, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group a écrit :

      - in 'ap_method_list_remove()',
            l->method_mask |= ~(AP_METHOD_BIT << methnum);

Doesn't this need to be

l->method_mask &= ~(AP_METHOD_BIT << methnum);

in order to remove it? Otherwise I set all methods but methnum.

        should be in the
            if (methnum != M_INVALID) { ... }
       block

Do you agree ?

Yes.

Regards

Rüdiger

Thanks for your comment.
Applied to trunk in r1610813 with your comment.
Proposed for 2.4.x.

Best regards,
CJ