FWIW, this is reported in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218I was thinking of a dual-approach: Increase PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE and making the truncation of the worker name (s->name) non-fatal (but logged at ALERT)... On Aug 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to propose that we bump up PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE > again, both in trunk but also allow for backporting to > 2.4.x as well. >
