> On 29 Aug 2014, at 21:05, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW, this is reported in > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218 > > I was thinking of a dual-approach: Increase PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE > and making the truncation of the worker name (s->name) non-fatal > (but logged at ALERT)... >
I've been bitten by this quite a few times as well. And always when you least expect it. Wondering if it is time to push long names into a uuid or hash; with a translation table/db file if needed. Dw. >> On Aug 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose that we bump up PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE >> again, both in trunk but also allow for backporting to >> 2.4.x as well. >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
