But IMHO that would be a major bump and not a minor one. And we cannot do major ones in stable branches.
Regards Rüdiger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:55 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > I think we can, as long as we bump the MMN... > > On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > > > Am 04.09.2014 um 12:13 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: > >> Can we really backport this? > >> > >> We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing > offsets inside the struct. > > > > Bummer, I guess you are right. mod_proxy.h seems to be part of the > public API so we can't backport like this. Will revoke the proposal. > > > > We could think about adding new larger name fields to the end of the > struct and keep a truncated copy in the original struct mebers. But that > means 3rd-party modules using the old original fields would only see > part of the names. > > > > Rainer > >
