> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:58 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > > On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Can we really backport this? > > > > We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing offsets > inside the struct. > > > > True, but if we bump the mmn, that should cover it. > > I know of no-one other than httpd that uses that struct anyway > and even though it's "public", no one else messes with > it.
Then it shouldn't be in a public header, but in a private one. Not sure how we can fix this now. > > I am a BIG +1 for fixing this. At the very least, we I agree that it would be a good fix. I am only worried about breaking our API promises. > should add the backport which makes truncation of > the name field a non-fatal error. +1 to making it a non-fatal error. Regards Rüdiger
