Thank you very much for your help, Yann! All, please test the patch and vote for us if you like it :-)
Thanks, Yingqi -----Original Message----- From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:45 PM To: httpd Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT Hi Yingqi, 2 votes already (on 3), it makes its way ;) Regards, Yann. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Lu, Yingqi <yingqi...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I just want to check if anyone gets chances to check the SO_REUSEPORT patch? > Any feedback? > > Thanks, > Yingqi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 8:58 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: SO_REUSEPORT > > Hi Christophe, Jim and Yann, > > Thank you very much for your consideration of putting SO_REUSEPORT patch in > the 2.4 stable release. > > I am also very happy that you find the white paper :-) All the most recent > testing results are included in the white paper. Also, we have tested the > (graceful) restart on the patch (previously, there was a bug.), it should be > fine now. Please test it to confirm. > > Please let me know if you need anything else. Your help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > Yingqi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:02 AM > To: httpd > Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Christophe JAILLET > <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >> >> Maybe, 2.4.14 could focus on reviewing/merging this patch and >> associated performance improvement? >> To help adoption, maybe an ASF server could be upgraded with a >> SO_REUSEPORT patched version of Apache to have our own measurements >> and see how it scales in a real world application. > > I did some testing with an injector at the time of the proposal (on a 2.2.x > version of the patch, so mainly with worker), and can confirm that it really > scales much better. > Where httpd without SO_REUSEPORT stops accepting/handling connections, it > continues to shine with the option/buckets enabled. > (I don't have the numbers for now, need to search deeper, btw the ones > from Intel are probably more of interest...) > > So regarding the upgrade on infra, the difference may not be obvious if the > tested machine is not "at the limits". > > One thing that probably is worth testing is (graceful) restarts, though. > > Regards, > Yann.
