Here at AL quite a lot sticking with 2.2 because third-party modules which are not available with 2.4. Like mod-perl etc.
> Op 27 mei 2015 om 22:42 heeft Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > het volgende geschreven: > > Not wanting to boast, but maybe mod_h2 for httpd 2.4 can play a role in > motivating people to migrate away from 2.2. > > I have not looked into having it work on 2.2 and no interest in doing so. If > we get the ALPN support into 2.4.13, mod_h2 can be just "dropped in" to such > a server. And distros will have an incentive to include it. > > In what amount that might influence 2.2 migrations, probably no one can > foretell. And I have not the insight to what all others reasons for migration > are, not knowing enough about the differences myself. I just want to point > out that it can be one selling point among others. > > As to how to sell it: I have made some performance tests and published some > numbers based on my single dev installation. It could certainly help to get > some more numbers in a more real world like env to either have a story to > tell - or find out what still needs to be done. > > What is floating around in the net are numbers from eithers servers no one > can install (google) or servers that focus on http2 like h2o or nghttpd. But > those are not general purpose servers, serve often only static files and > sometimes even fail under load. I'm not saying they are bad implementations > (far from it), there just not in the domain as httpd. > > cheers, Stefan > > > >> Am 27.05.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>: >> >> one thing it means is having compelling stories involving the latest hot >> tech that use 2.4
