Hi Christophe,

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christophe JAILLET
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> should this warning at startup be an issue, why not just remove it in 2.4.x
> and keep it in trunk?
> Having the depreciation written in doc (and in migration note for 2.4 ->
> 2.6/3.0 one day) could be enough, no?

Probably, but the (only one) warning per startup can possibly
encourage users to look at the doc :)
Let's see what others say.

>
>
> BTW, the apr_pstrdup(ap_pglobal, "1") could be just "1".

I'm not sure, if mod_ssl is loaded dynamically, "1" could possibly be
un/reloaded with it (.text section)...

Regards,
Yann.

Reply via email to