On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: >>> >>>> Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] >>>> Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim >>>> File length: 57106 byte(s) >>>> Diff to previous 1674655 (colored) >>>> Merge r1676085 from trunk: >>>> >>>> consistently output SSLCertificateChainFile deprecation warnings >>>> Submitted by: kbrand >>>> Reviewed/backported by: jim >>>> >>>> sent the warnings to the console/main server error log, rather than a >>>> specific server error log file. Because this is during config parsing, >>>> it that may have previously been a bit bucket. So this could be >>>> perceived as a regression although the logic and log file activity was >>>> there for some time. >>>> >>> >>> Indeed there was a discussion thread for r1562500 in 2014 during which >>> Falco Schwarz reported, that he did *not* get the log message a anywhere >>> (neither console, not log files) when he had the directive only in >>> VirtualHosts. After the 2.4.13 change it seems to be new, that you get the >>> message massively on console, if you have the directive in frequent use >>> inside VHosts. That might well be perceived as a regression. >>> >>> The 2.4.13 change replaced cmd->server in ap_log_error by NULL. The log >>> level "APLOG_WARNING|APLOG_STARTUP" was not changed. >>> >>> Rainer >>> >>> >> I definitely have the old code and the SPAM... I wonder if before you >> didn't see it if you didn't have vhost-specific logs configured, and now >> you see it regardless? >> > > so weird: > > With the old code, I have globally "LogLevel debug" and in a vhost > "LogLevel warn" ; if I comment out that vhost's "LogLevel" I don't see the > message even though I have ErrorLog in the vhost and *should* inherit the > global LogLevel. > > >> -- >> Born in Roswell... married an alien... >> http://emptyhammock.com/ >> >> > > > -- > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > http://emptyhammock.com/ > > I'm a flip-flopper who didn't understand the subtlety of this before... I say "regression", though I think it is acceptable to have a tiny recommended patch for those affected. As for why one or more messages hits the console for something to be dealt with by the time you upgrade to an as-yet-non-existing future release stream, I don't have any justification. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
