> Am 27.08.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: icing >> Date: Thu Aug 27 11:25:09 2015 >> New Revision: 1698117 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698117 >> Log: >> adding r1698116 to core-protocols.patch to clarify new api >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1698117&r1=1698116&r2=1698117&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 11:25:09 2015 >> @@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> http://svn.apache.org/r1610674 (partial) >> http://svn.apache.org/r1685069 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1693918 >> + http://svn.apache.org/r1698116 > > Looks like it does not belong to this patchset (and the patch below)
The first half about http_protocol.h does. From this and all other changes, the directory modules/http2 needs to be ignored. Is that a problem? <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
