> Am 21.10.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>: > > On 21 Oct 2015, at 4:18 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > wrote: > >> 7. The buckets passed down on the master connection are using another buffer >> - when on https:// - >> to influence the SSL record sizes on write. Another COPY is not nice, but >> write performance >> is better this way. The ssl optimizations in place do not work for HTTP/2 >> as it has other >> bucket patterns. We should look if we can combine this into something >> without COPY, but with >> good sized SSL writes. > > mod_ssl already worries about buffering on it’s own, there is no need to > recreate this functionality. Was this not working?
As I wrote "it has other bucket patterns", which do not get optimized by the coalescing filter of mod_ssl. //Stefan
