> Am 21.10.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>:
> 
> On 21 Oct 2015, at 4:18 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 7. The buckets passed down on the master connection are using another buffer 
>> - when on https:// -
>>  to influence the SSL record sizes on write. Another COPY is not nice, but 
>> write performance
>>  is better this way. The ssl optimizations in place do not work for HTTP/2 
>> as it has other
>>  bucket patterns. We should look if we can combine this into something 
>> without COPY, but with
>>  good sized SSL writes.
> 
> mod_ssl already worries about buffering on it’s own, there is no need to 
> recreate this functionality. Was this not working?

As I wrote "it has other bucket patterns", which do not get optimized by the 
coalescing filter of mod_ssl.

//Stefan

Reply via email to