> Am 28.10.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]>: > On 10/28/2015 04:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> [Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c?rev=1711044&r1=1711043&r2=1711044&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c Wed Oct 28 15:53:07 2015 >> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ h2_mplx *h2_mplx_create(conn_rec *c, apr >> >> m->bucket_alloc = apr_bucket_alloc_create(m->pool); >> >> - m->q = h2_tq_create(m->id, m->pool); >> + m->q = h2_tq_create(m->pool, 23); > > I thought the answer to the last question was 42 :-). Seriously using a > hardcoded value that is not done via a #define > with a descriptive name and that is not documented is IMHO bad.
You are correct. I need to give this change a rework anyway, so this number will disappear. //Stefan
