On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 5:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > I suggest this is wrong, and that the appropriate table should be built. > > EBCDIC platforms do have i18n (typicially single-byte) lower/upper > equivalences, and the underlying implementation should not be trusted for > straight ASCII token case insensitive comparisons.
I don't see it why it shouldn't be trusted, but I've reverted for now, I'll revisit when this settles down / the function is used somewhere.
