On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:33 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > Have a look at r1715632 and let me know what you think.
I was concered about sorting but saw that's already not totally kosher for !APR_CHARSET_EBCDIC from your earlier comments. I am +1 to making them used (named) for equality tests only to avoid subtle problems down the road.
