On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
wrote:
> one type of failure remains:
>
> .../server/core.c: In function 'ap_get_remote_host':
> .../server/core.c:959:17: error: cannot take address of bit-field
> 'double_reverse'
> do_double_reverse(&conn->double_reverse,
> conn->remote_host,
> ^
> .../server/core.c:974:9: error: cannot take address of bit-field
> 'double_reverse'
> do_double_reverse(&conn->double_reverse, conn->remote_host,
> ^
>
Funny enough, because this is inline, the assignment of an int to an int :2
raises no truncation warning; the entire return {val} is in the domain
1..-1 :)
These should all be ready for further review against trunk and 2.4.x. I can
spend time Sunday reviewing any new edge cases specific to trunk, the
grep pattern "[>_]remote_host" was pretty efficient at tracking these down.
Bill
