> Am 02.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>: > > On 02 Mar 2016, at 2:26 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Would it make sense to add a vector of contexts that same way we have a >>>> vector of configs, one slot for each module, which will allow any module >>>> to add a context of it’s own to conn_rec without having to extend conn_rec? >>> >>> Can't the existing ap_[gs]et_module_config(c->conn_config, ...) be >>> used for that purpose? >> >> I mean, put the context in the module config? > > If we can it would be great - but is there an API guarantee that the memory > pointed to by the config is a per-connection copy of the config, and not the > raw underlying server wide config instead?
Does not, for example, mod_ssl rely on that?