+1
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Stefan Eissing <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> We now set exactly the same callback right before in line 709. If we had more
> than one callback, we would not have to specify NULL, but restore any
> previous callback there was, right?
>
> But that is all just theoretical, as You and Yann already stated.
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a reson why we use ssl_callback_SSLVerify instead of NULL like we
>>> do in asimilar situation below?
>>> IMHO we do not want to change the callback here to whatever it may set.
>>> I agree that in practice there won't be any difference right now, since we
>>> only have one callback.
>>
>> I agree that if/when we have multiple callback possibilities, we
>> should set NULL here, but also above where we force the new mode.
>>
>> Nothing to worry about for now, though.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yann.
>
