On Aug 2, 2016 11:58 AM, "William A Rowe Jr" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think we should look into other stuff we could fold in in >> the short term. > > > Seems overdue for us to fold the HTTP_STRICT logic back into 2.4 and 2.2 > before we tag and roll again. It seems pretty odd not to follow RFC2068, > never mind the RFC 2616 and 723x group of specs. Objections or other > observations?
One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box default to strict parsing.
