> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely
>> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On
>> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box
>> default to strict parsing.
> (I have no strong opinions on whether or not this should go into the next
> release, though.)
Any more thoughts related to this? I know that it is
still being worked here and there, but knowing whether or
not it will be folded in 2.4.24 might be incentive to
finish polishing as it were.