> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely
>> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On
>> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box
>> default to strict parsing.
> +1.
> (I have no strong opinions on whether or not this should go into the next 
> release, though.)

Any more thoughts related to this? I know that it is
still being worked here and there, but knowing whether or
not it will be folded in 2.4.24 might be incentive to
finish polishing as it were.

Reply via email to