On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric, do you agree for the immediate future that we can live with this > solution?
Looks OK from an EBCDIC POV to me. I get the same results on my workstation as on the EBCDIC host for this test -- no 8859-1 0x80-0xff show up as control characters after conversion to 1047. Thanks again Bill.
