On 31 Oct 2016, at 4:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:

> Which creates the generic question for me: Can't we setup APR in a way that 
> for certain aspects we could compile
> "drivers" against an existing APR whose code exists outside of APR first and 
> gets part of standard APR later easily?
> I guess the redis stuff does not necessarily qualifies for this idea yet, 
> because we have no caching backend API defined
> in APR yet that would allow to just plugin different drivers / providers 
> (memcache does not seem to have a genric API
> defined yet).

We used to - that was what apr-util was for.

You have a point, there is nothing stopping us creating an apr-util-cache-redis 
package with a lifecycle of it’s own.

Regards,
Graham
—

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to