On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > (I don't know the answer to your question in particular, but I think there > was also discussion a while ago about a mod_proxy_tcp, which might be > relevant to the discussion?)
There is already duplication between mod_proxy_wstunnell and mod_proxy_connect because they are both basically setup + TCP tunnell. I am not sure how usable the async stuff in wstunnell is. it would be awesome if it worked/worked better and other modules that were basically just tunnelling got it for free. I think the approach is only really valid for things very similar to TCP tunnels.
