On 12/21/2016 05:40 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: >> (I don't know the answer to your question in particular, but I think there >> was also discussion a while ago about a mod_proxy_tcp, which might be >> relevant to the discussion?) > > There is already duplication between mod_proxy_wstunnell and > mod_proxy_connect because they are both basically setup + TCP tunnell. > > I am not sure how usable the async stuff in wstunnell is. it would be > awesome if it worked/worked better and other modules that were > basically just tunnelling got it for free. I think the approach is > only really valid for things very similar to TCP tunnels. >
Actually the mod_tcp / mod_proxy_tcp / mod_ssl_tcp patch isn't merged in trunk and I am locking for a quick solution in httpd-2.4.x I will try the patch and see if that helps. Cheers Jean-Frederic
