On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > So I'd like to know, in light of a perpetual chain of (often build and/or > run-time breaking regression) enhancements, if there is support for a > 2.4.24.x release chain during the 3.0 transition? And support for > potentially 3x backports to 2.4.x, 2.4.24.x and 2.2.x, of really serious bug > fixes?
Not personally in favor of it, but would help maintain it if that's what the community wants. I don't recall much breakage in 2.4 over the past 6 months, much less breakage that would have impeded anyones work for a significant amount of time. Nobody built on Windows prior to the release so we had a re-roll. I don't think the corrective action here is a new service stream. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
