Do we foresee an issue w/ it moving to RTC? I don't...
I think we could get the required 3 +1s quite easily.

> On Apr 18, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Eric Covener <> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Nick Kew <> wrote:
>> Why would it be good for a stable (i.e. non-experimental)
>> component of httpd to have an entirely different commit
>> policy to the project as a whole?  Surely the CTR is in
>> recognition of its experimental status, to lubricate the
>> process of hacking it into shape.
> For the record, I have no defense for keeping it CTR. I primarily
> wanted to highlight that it was a factor.

Reply via email to