> I hope this looks attractive to you. All bugs are mine. Let me know what you > think.
It looks neat. I think accessible doc will be key. But for the sake of discussion, what will we do / what will distributors do when say TLS1.3 or some esoteric part of it is only available in some SSL toolkit releases? It seems like over time there are a lot of confusion with compile-time vs. runtime openssl, forks, etc that either push towards "modern" being ambiguous for a user or to have lots of different permutations defined. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
