> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 10:31
> An: httpd-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Betreff: Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)
> I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if
> you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la
> "svn delete").
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing
> <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> > Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic. You could make a
> > dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People wanting to
> > "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS.
> >> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>:
> >> To be clear: "delete" simply means "no longer seen in HEAD". This is
> version control. The data cannot truly be deleted, so it can always be
> revived. Or reviewed.
> >> On Oct 25, 2017 12:31, "Marion & Christophe JAILLET"
> <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >> Just to mention that before giving a +1, I made a copy of these
> repositories in order to dig later on, in order to see if something
> useful seems to be there.
> >> Don't have that much time these days to play with httpd, but will do
> and will report anything that looks valuable.
> >> CJ
> >> Le 25/10/2017 à 14:29, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> >> Are there anything of "value" in any of those branches?
> >> If not, prune away!
> >> On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>
> >> On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote:
> >> Can someone clean up the not needed anymore backports/branches
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/
> >> httpd 2.4.1 was tagged at r1243503.
> >> I'd propose we start by pruning all working branches not updated
> since this tag.
> >> Thoughts?