Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic. You could make a dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People wanting to "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS.
> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>: > > To be clear: "delete" simply means "no longer seen in HEAD". This is version > control. The data cannot truly be deleted, so it can always be revived. Or > reviewed. > > On Oct 25, 2017 12:31, "Marion & Christophe JAILLET" > <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Just to mention that before giving a +1, I made a copy of these repositories > in order to dig later on, in order to see if something useful seems to be > there. > Don't have that much time these days to play with httpd, but will do and will > report anything that looks valuable. > > CJ > > > Le 25/10/2017 à 14:29, Jim Jagielski a écrit : > Are there anything of "value" in any of those branches? > > If not, prune away! > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: > > Can someone clean up the not needed anymore backports/branches > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/ > > httpd 2.4.1 was tagged at r1243503. > > I'd propose we start by pruning all working branches not updated since this > tag. > > Thoughts? > >
