On 02/15/2018 07:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It seems like some serious overhead to force a function call > for each and every access to a struct field, especially if
I don't see this in the proposal below. _sizeof() and / or _copy would IMHO only be needed in rare cases and probably non critical pathes. They could be handy though. I don't see any kind of _get / _set for each field below. > it's only so we can adjust those struct fields w/o a corresponding > change in the ABI... Regards Rüdiger
