> On Feb 7, 2018, at 12:04 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Personally, I still think that updating these fields for 2.4.x >> makes sense and can be justified... but am in no mood >> for a battle *grin* > > As long as the change allows you to compile the backport and rebuild > mod_proxy_balancer *alone*... without needing to rebuild all of the > consumers, then your change is likely similarly safe for third party > modules consuming our API.
Just mod_proxy_balancer and proxy_util...
