+1... The whole idea is to find bugs and issues before we do a formal release. We found one. It may have been "minor" but releasing s/w with known bugs is not something we should do. We release code when it's ready.
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > On 2018-03-05 10:31, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:56:50AM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >>> Hi, all; >>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate >>> tarball as 2.4.31: >>> [+1] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> +1 on release for the record. Tests and installs fine on Fedora >> 27/x86_64. >> ab is not the nicest pile of code, existence of bugs there are a long >> way from showstopper material IMO, even if regressions - the tool is >> completely ignored by a large % of our users. >> Regards, Joe > > > Hi, Joe > I tend to agree in principle. At the same time, we've discussed here that > version numbers are cheap and that we generally would like to release more > often, so I wanted to 'walk the talk'. Thank you for testing things out. The > vote is not wasted since it builds confidence in the rest of the release. > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri