On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Steffen, hi list,
>>>
>>> Am 12.03.2018 um 14:07 schrieb Steffen:
>>>>
>>>> I think it should released with 2.4.32 (+) .
>>>>
>>>> Endly  solved  a pain with  all that crashes.
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for reminding us of that problem.
>>>
>>> Since it is a logging only change for INFO log level and our default log
>>> level is WARN, plus as far as I understand you it is not a regression, I
>>> would personally tend to not rate this as a showstopper.
>>
>> I wonder if the C99 macro expansion for rerror was also technically
>> risky even w/ WARN?
>
> I think we have the same issue at macro expansion time than at
> potential/external "error_log" hook, we can't dereference 'r' from
> ap_process_async_request() in any case.
> So this might happen with vanilla httpd too (modulo pool recycling/cache...).

Maybe a queryable,  mpm_common way of deferring the
clear/destroy/whatever of the request pool? I don't the best grip on
the whole EOR thing.

-- 
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com

Reply via email to