> On Mar 15, 2018, at 4:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Author: ylavic > Date: Thu Mar 15 20:39:42 2018 > New Revision: 1826862 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1826862&view=rev > Log: > Makes sense, withdrawing. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >
When we run into things like this, what should our policy by? Should we also remove the code from trunk? From a 2.6/2.5 branch? Or do we leave code and functionality in that causes "concern" related to it being a back port, depending, of course, on what that concern *is*.
