On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Mar 15, 2018, at 4:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Author: ylavic >> Date: Thu Mar 15 20:39:42 2018 >> New Revision: 1826862 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1826862&view=rev >> Log: >> Makes sense, withdrawing. >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> > > When we run into things like this, what should our policy by? Should we > also remove the code from trunk? From a 2.6/2.5 branch? Or do we > leave code and functionality in that causes "concern" related to it > being a back port, depending, of course, on what that concern *is*. >
In this specific case, the concern is the default behavior change on a non-release boundary, so a good action is something like an upgrading.xml update. There is already a docs@ bug for mentioning the current limitation. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
